Replies to Michael Kremer
نویسنده
چکیده
First, is existence really not essential by my definition? My answer is that it is neither universally essential, nor universally non-essential, and not by the definition Michael considers. The reason for this answer is that the definition Michael considers does not express the sense in which I claim (as I believe, together with Aquinas) that ‘exists’ is not an essential predicate of creatures, while it is an essential predicate of God.
منابع مشابه
Why the Government Should Subsidize the Purchase of Patented Pharmaceuticals
Economist Michael Kremer recently proposed that the government offer to buy important pharmaceutical patents from their respective patent holdersJ His argument is that public ownership would largely eliminate the monopolist ic distortions caused by the patent system, distortions that tend to be especially acute in the pharmaceutical context, z Under Kremer ' s proposal, the government would pay...
متن کاملComment on Macartan Humphreys’ and Other Recent Discussions of the Miguel and Kremer (2004) Study
The replication of the Miguel and Kremer 2004 Econometrica paper, “Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health In the Presence of Treatment Externalities”, carried out by Aiken et al. and Davey et al. and our responses to the replication, which can be found here and here, triggered discussions by scholars and media taking an interest in the evidence base for mass deworming policies in re...
متن کاملWorms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملCommentary: Deworming externalities and schooling impacts in Kenya: a comment on Aiken et al. (2015) and Davey et al. (2015).
Commentary: Deworming externalities and schooling impacts in Kenya: a comment on Aiken et al. (2015) and Davey et al. (2015) Joan Hamory Hicks, Michael Kremer and Edward Miguel* University of California, Center for Effective Global Action, Berkeley, California, USA, Department of Economics, Harvard University and NBER, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA and Department of Economics, University of Cal...
متن کامل